Regardless of how Gu Jun responded, either frowning in thought or the answer quickly slipping out of his mouth, the 3 interviewers remained cold and expressionless. “Do you enjoy intense emotion and passion?”
Is it my personal attributions and understanding of the world?Īfter some thought, Gu Jun had to choose, “Somewhere in between.” What if that stranger is a murderer? What if the dog is my best partner for years? Why didn’t I think of a good man and an evil dog? Do I believe that dogs are kinder than man? Immediately, multiple considerations drowned Gu Jun’s mind. Based on the different scenarios, the answer would drastically change. “A stranger passing away compared to a dog’s passing. “A stray dog dropped into the ocean and drowned. The square-faced man on the left asked again, “Do u wish to go to Heaven after death?” Conventionally, a solution similar to the perfect response would yield 2 points, a vastly different answer would be 0points, lastly 1 point for a neutral reply. Gu Jun had no idea what was the ideal answer. The moment he replied, the 3 interviewers swiftly scribbled on the documents in front of them. Just as the timing was passing the 5-second mark, he replied, “Yes.” If it was a few months ago, he would have said not. At the moment, were there any demons that were unable to be understood by science? However, he was unsure about this understanding. The demons that were on his mind right now were religious devils. From the interviewer’s perspective, the candidate’s understanding of the questionnaire could reflect the person’s consciousness, personal attributes, and beliefs. Gu Jun knew that his way of interpreting this word, “demons”, was a part of the test. What kind of demons? Metaphorical demons? Or religious devils? Translator: Larbre Studio Editor: Larbre Studio
0 kommentar(er)
